![]() Unlike traditional UPC barcodes, which are made up of a number of horizontal lines, a QR code can be captured more quickly and can contain more information. Short for "Quick Response code," QR codes are square barcodes first developed in Japan. ![]() Our tags enable you to add far more than is required of the act and as 92% of the population own a mobile and 85% of those a smartphone there are probably more people capable of reading a smart tag than could read at all in 1950. There has never been a prosecution of a QR or NFC enabled dog tag owner. They are not stupid and recognise the benefits of modern tags. Only local authorities are empowered to enforce the act, not police. ![]() We are campaigning for the act to be brought into line. The act states that your name and address must be on the tag, ignored by most for very good reason, it's not safe to do so anymore. The act originated in 1920, unless you lived in Downton Abbey you probably didn't have a telephone but common sense should have prevailed by 1992. The act is so outdated it doesn't even insist on a telephone number, the first and most logical means of contacting an owner quickly. In 1992 when the current act was passed there was no such thing as The Internet and technology has changed things dramatically. Fortunately our Local Authorities are not locked in the past. It is still the responsibility of Local Authorities and only Local Authorities to enforce this law. No thought or consideration has gone into the 'Control of Dogs Order 1992' to bring an outdated act in line with modern technology and current theft epidemics in the UK. X Does a DogTrac ID Tag comply with UK Law?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |